Mendacity 8.1

Recent incontestable proof that “Barack Hussein Obama’s” birth certificate is fake has been met with deafening silence by the mainstream media. However, “Barry Soetoro” reports that more is to come on the subject soon:

Barry Soetoro: Obama Fake ID: More Coming Under Trump?

Obama Nailed! Globalists Panic, MSM Freaks!

From Carl Gallups:

Obama Fraud Birth Document Archives


Cinderella’s Fake News Forum: #1

Occasionally, Cinderella will be posting items on the Sandy Hook 12-14-12 Event that give you, the reader, a chance to exercise your wits in determining whether or not a news story or social media item (posts, Tweets and messages) is true or false.

Most will be small items not previously closely examined in the continuing Sandy Hook narrative. Some may seem trivial to the point of pettiness, but Cinderella has found that many tiny hanging threads eventually unravel a whole sweater, especially if the sweater is cheaply made.

We’re calling these little threads Cinderella’s Fake News Forum. Cinderella will do her best to provide  background, research and commentary to aid you in your reality check journey. As always, feel free to ferret out more facts on your own and share them with us.

News Item #1: Tweet by Erica L. Lafferty, December 6, 2016.


In the item above, Erica L. Lafferty asserts that she dressed the post-mortem, bullet-riddled body of her mother, Dawn Lafferty Hochsprung, for her funeral. True? False? Let’s examine some of the facts.

The body. This is the central point. If someone says she “dressed” a body, the casual listener automatically assumes there is a body to be dressed. Not necessarily. Click here for a host of reasons why this may not be true. Click here for information on how corpses can be faked. And click here for another interesting article on a similar subject.

The dress. According to this source (New York Daily News), Dawn Lafferty Hochsprung had an open casket funeral on December 19, 2012 – five days after the Sandy Hook Event – in which her reported body wore “a green silk dress and black cardigan.” So Ms. Lafferty is ostensibly referring to this particular dress and sweater in her Tweet.

The funeral. We are told in this article (Washington Post) that Mrs. Hochsprung’s funeral took place at the Munson-Lovetere Funeral Home in Woodbury, Connecticut. By Connecticut state law, Munson-Lovetere would be the party responsible for handling the death certificate and all subsequent matters concerning the body. (See The law, below.)

The reported body’s transfer. After the funeral, Dawn Lafferty Hochsprung’s reported body was transported over state lines to Halgas Funeral Home in Broadalbin, New York, and was buried a day later (12-20-14) in the Broadalbin Union Mills Cemetery. You can read about such facts and the evidence supporting them here. Note that the town clerk of Broadalbin, with whom we spoke by phone in October 2016, expressed bewilderment as to why she does not have a death certificate or burial transport permit in her files for Dawn Lafferty Hochsprung.

The law. What does the State of Connecticut have to say about transporting, cleansing and dressing dead bodies? Well, quite a lot actually. From this official Connecticut Judicial Branch website, we found these passages (most relevant language in my bf italics):

“Connecticut law requires a licensed funeral director or embalmer to be involved in a number of ways throughout the burial or cremating process including the death certificate; removal, burial and transit permits; removal of the body; and transporting, washing, and wrapping of the dead body.

“PREPARATION AND TRANSPORTATION OF DEAD BODIES / Public Acts enacted in 2007 (PAs 07-104, amended by PA 07- 252) established requirements for transporting, handling, and cleansing dead bodies. These acts set out a number of specific requirements addressing how a dead body must be transported, washed, embalmed, wrapped, and disinfected. The law also prohibits an embalmer or funeral director from removing a dead body from the place of death to another location for preparation until the body has been temporarily wrapped (CGS § 19a-91(a), (b)).”

Of course, the State of Connecticut doesn’t have a spotless record in enforcing its laws where funeral directors/embalmers are concerned.  Here is one egregious example.

The procedure. Dressing a dead body is no picnic for the squeamish and hyper-sensitive. All the more so if the dead body is, as Erica claimed, riddled with bullets. That is because certain things must happen first that only a professional is fully equipped to handle. A post-mortem examination in the case of murder victims, for instance, then transport to a qualified funeral home. If embalmed, the body must be bathed, drained of blood, infused with chemicals and bathed once more. The eyes must be fitted with “eye caps” to hold them closed. Makeup is applied to the face. And while family members are called upon to supply the clothing, they don’t normally dress the body.

For obvious reasons, in most circumstances, families leave the cleaning, draining and dressing to the professionals, and are required to do so by certain states.

But there are some hardy do-it-yourselfers for whom such a task might be an experiential adventure. They step out of their normal milieu, perform tasks for which they aren’t qualified, then mount the podium to tell others all about it. George Plimpton, for instance. Remember him?

The bullets. Erica doesn’t tell us how many bullets riddled her mother’s body. Yet, if the murder happened as has been alleged, surely she knows this fact. It seems odd that, to our knowledge, this detail has never been disclosed by someone so personally invested in the authenticity of the Sandy Hook event and the issue of gun control.

On the day of the shooting, Dawn Hochsprung herself was reported by the Newtown Bee to have said that the shots fired were “more than she could count,” and went “on and on.” The statement was retracted by the Bee three days later as an error. But the cache date on the article (12-13-12) told a different story. (Click here and here.)

It should be stated that the exact number of bullet wounds are recorded somewhere in the autopsy report; however, in Connecticut, such data are not available to the general public without the written consent of a family member or a court order.

Key questions.

  • Was there a dead body belonging to Dawn Lafferty Hochsprung?
  • If so, was it dressed by her daughter Erica L. Lafferty or not?

If your answer to one or both of these questions is, “No” or “I’m not sure,” then you should pursue the Sandy Hook matter further on your own through as many sources as are available to you. Cinderella’s Broom is the least of these. Here is another. And another. And another. And another. And another. And on and on and on and on it goes, more by now than we can count.


My position on Donald Trump

Excellent analysis by a pro, and since it has a bearing on “fake news” aka mainstream media, I’m reblogging it.

Jon Rappoport's Blog

My position on Donald Trump

by Jon Rappoport

December 22, 2016

I’ve written many words about the man and what he’s been doing. To repeat a few of them, his two most important achievements are: he’s contributing, in a major way, to the ongoing destruction of the credibility of big media; and he kept Hillary Clinton out of the White House.

Concerning the media— I am tremendously enthusiastic about what Trump has done. I pop champagne corks on that one. He’s provided a public service for the ages. We would be light years beyond where we are now, if the world of conventional journalism hadn’t sold its soul, its morality, its intelligence, and its hunger for getting to the bottom of things so long ago. In his own improvisations and riffs, Trump has turned the media stars on their heads looking out of their asses. He has been merciless. He…

View original post 2,341 more words

Mendacity 8.0

Surprise, surprise. Barack Obama’s birth certificate is a fabrication (a “fraudulently manufactured document”), say two forensic document experts working on two different continents without each others’ knowledge. Separately, each found nine points of forgery. See below for investigator Mike Zullo’s testimony:

PNN Exclusive report on 9-point Obama birth certificate fraud – Press Release Video

Barry Soetoro: Proof Obama forged birth certificate

Hagmann & Hagmann: Public office requires the public’s trust

Infowars: Sheriff Arpaio proves Obama’s birth certificate is forged

This simply adds another fake beard to the imposter kit that Barack Obama has been carrying around with him for eight years in the White House. As Sandy Hook researchers already know, Obama uses multiple social security numbers, one of which was originally issued in 1977 to one Harrison J. Bounel, who likely died in the Fairfield State Hospital in Newtown, CT.

Details on that here.

Mainstream media, the self-declared magistrate in determining what constitutes fake news and what doesn’t, will likely ignore this latest proof of Obama’s false composite identity.

“What difference does it make?” As for Barry, he may as well steal Hillary’s line. He’s already proven himself to be a thief of other people’s birth certificate stamps and social security numbers.

So far, Obama has attempted to deflect the issue by (1) promising Russia reprisals over their falsely reported “hacking” into the U.S. election, and (2) promptly bundling off  troops to an area near the Russian border.

To Cinderella this sounds like a false-flag-in-the-making of biblical proportions. Prepare yourself. Obama seems to be readying himself for the biggest lie of his career.







Revisiting a storybook character.

As Sandy Hook records another 12-14-12 memorial event, Cinderella has been opening her scrapbook and examining old pictures and clips. It never hurts to review our history, and, not surprisingly, others are following suit in an effort to understand what really happened that day and in the weeks and months (and years) preceding it.

One photo that appeared in the pages churned out by the mainstream press continues to haunt: Principal Dawn Lafferty Hochsprung dressed as a storybook fairy queen in a high-necked bridal gown while holding a star-tipped wand. The full-length photograph can still be viewed with a Google image search and a little luck. Here it is below:


The photo appears to have been taken at Sandy Hook Elementary School on November 16, 2012, based on a related photo that appears on Mrs. Hochsprung’s Twitter account.

Mrs. Hochsprung’s fairy godmotherish appearance aside, does the photograph serve another purpose? Is it possibly an example of the predictive programming we have witnessed in connection with multiple disastrous events, including Sandy Hook? (Click here for more on that.)

More to the point, is it an example of “revelation of the method,” by which a gangster Cryptocracy mocks the public — revealing its devices before or even after creating a traumatic event? (Click here.)

Let’s examine the elements of the photograph more closely.

The missing head. What struck us as very odd is the way this photo was cropped in the Patch article where it first appeared. For some reason – a mistake? – the editor (Paul Singley*) cropped out Mrs. Hochsprung’s head, as shown in the truncated version below:


{from Patch article, “Sandy Hook Principal: Mother, Educator, Leader, Hero,” Jan. 24, 2013}

Mistake or not, the cropping has created an unfortunate visual pun: the “head” (of the school) is gone.  While we doubt that this was Patch’s intention, one has to acknowledge it. And there’s another possibility: the head was purposely cropped out to focus attention on the book beneath it.

Of course, the missing head photo could mean nothing at all. It’s likely a mistake someone overlooked and it has survived over the years as typos often do. But as readers of this blog know, Cinderella thinks we can learn a lot from people’s mistakes.

A book about a disaster. The star-tipped wand is posed and angled to point toward the title of the book. Given the way Mrs. Hochsprung is dressed, we might expect the storybook to be The Wizard of Oz or some other fable involving a fairy princess. But instead we find the title of a rhyming book popular among very young children: Chicka Chicka Boom Boom. More on that title below, but first let’s examine what the book is all about. Amazon provides the following description from Publisher’s Weekly:

“In this bright and lively rhyme, the letters of the alphabet race each other to the top of the coconut tree. When X, Y and Z finally scramble up the trunk, however, the weight is too much, and down they all tumble in a colorful chaotic heap: “Chicka Chicka . . . BOOM! BOOM!” All the family members race to help, as one by one the letters recover in amusingly battered fashion.”

“Boom! Boom!” Cinderella doesn’t need to tell her readers why that example of onomatopoiea is relevant to our subject.

Let’s take a look at an excerpt from one of the less enthusiastic customer reviews of Chicka Chick Boom Boom from Amazon’s review page: I think I just don’t get the appeal of this book, or maybe I’m not reading it with the right inflection. People love this book, including our baby sitter. I just don’t. It kinda outlines a disaster type scenario in a lighthearted way, that is really superficial (the coconut tree falls down with all the little children/alphabet letters in it and everyone is a little banged up). But it doesn’t really present this in a way that’s Mr. Roger’s like (“look for the helpers”), it just focuses on how banged up all the kids are.”


26 characters. Twenty-six people were reported to have been gunned down (“Boom!”) at Sandy Hook Elementary by Adam Lanza on 12-14-12. In Chicka Chicka Boom Boom, we have a story in which 26 characters (the letters of the alphabet) fall down and go boom at the base of a tree. It could be taken as prophetic forecasting of another disaster, obviously not by the book’s authors, but by someone or Something. You get my point. Of course, it may mean nothing at all.


{Sandy Hook Promise symbolic “tree” logo: A large hand reaching up to 26 small hands}
All of the above may be nothing more than a string of coincidences, interesting ones that “rhyme” with the Sandy Hook 12-14-12 event. Or they may be the fingerprints of something else, of which predictive programming is but one possibility.
As for the title of the book Mrs. Hochsprung is holding in the photo, it’s a shame that such innocent words now carry the freight of coded sexual innuendo. Of course, there may be no connection whatsoever between such things and the storybook the fairy queen is holding. Cinderella is not making an accusation, merely an observation. There is a difference.

In a normal world, where children are valued and loved – and not exposed to unspeakable acts by depraved adults – discovering the sinister nestled cleverly within the innocent would be a rare occurrence. But that isn’t the world we live in, is it. Unfortunately not.

So we must conclude that there may be something wrong with this picture.


*Paul Singley, the editor credited for the Patch article containing the cropped photo, was a friend of Mrs. Hochsprung’s. See the excerpt below from this article:

“Hochsprung took a personal interest in her employees, so much so that it changed the course of some of their lives. In addition to encouraging her to become a teacher, Hochsprung played matchmaker for Singley, introducing her to journalist Paul Singley, who was at the school covering an event for the local newspaper in November 2005.

The couple married three years later and now have a young daughter.

“She gave me the greatest gift anyone has ever given me,” an emotional Paul Singley, now a senior editor for the online news service and an adjunct professor at a local community college, told the hundreds gathered in Naugatuck on Tuesday night. “I look at my daughter and I can’t help think she gave me another great gift in this world.””