The golden egg.

Charlottesville. North Korea. Islamic jihad within the U.S. government. Zionist plots.

As the mainstream news media continues to spin lies about issues like these – all of which merit careful attention – certain stories remain well beneath the radar of national attention. Yet these stories, in my opinion, are at the crux of why so much is happening so quickly in huge, distracting firework displays, as the truth is whited out.

Despite the many wonderful people in the world, sadistic sociopaths are gaining ground. The golden eggs are war on the one hand and innocence on the other.

War is coming while innocence feeds the machine. Child exploitation keeps the banksters, the various “governments,” their agencies, the media, the entertainment industries and corporations flush. The desire for innocent flesh drives the black ops, the control grid and the money machine. It’s all satanic and it will result in the end of the world as we know it. Meantime, people must a. acknowledge it and b. turn (repent).

Here is an aid to accomplishing “a” from The Honeybee.

Here is an aid for “b” from Fellowship of the Minds.

Pretending everything is alright – or that you’re alright and other people aren’t – is not the solution. Fervent prayer is.

~C.

SH: A crystal-clear analysis by James Fetzer.

For those still having trouble understanding where the Sandy Hook narrative departs from real-life facts and evidence, Cinderella recommends this Real Deal video from Prof. James Fetzer.

  • Learn about signs of the school having been mothballed long before the event
  • Partake in a lesson on photographic “staging” and ruminate over the lack of evidence of any evacuation of the 400+ students from the school
  • Wonder at the bizarre absence of a Medivac helicopter
  • Explore the absence of emergency vehicles at the school itself ; such vehicles (and not many) were present only at the firehouse
  • Scratch your head over why trained EMTs were denied access to the school
  • Rehash the claims of the modern-day jester, Gene Rosen, while examining the “EVERYONE MUST CHECK IN” sign looming in the background
  • Witness the mysteriously present Port-A-Potties at the so-called crime scene along with bottled water and pizza in abundance in the adjacent firehouse
  • Ponder Social Security Death Index anomalies
  • See parents happily toting toddlers to the so-called crime scene
  • Ask yourself why badges on lanyards, worn by those in attendance, have color codes that correspond to those designated for a FEMA drill
  • Examine excerpts from a FEMA drill planned for 12/13/12
  • Imagine yourself climbing through a shard-edged hole in the SH front entrance, as 16 police troopers swore they did in succession, without one of them opening the nearby door for the next in line
  • Review coroner Wayne Carver’s bizarre statements concerning Newtown
  • Ask yourself how an allegedly metal-averse young man with Asperger’s syndrome could handle a Bushmaster with so much efficiency and speed that 20 children were each shot three to eleven times, as alleged by Wayne Carver
  • Where are the fingerprints on the rifle allegedly used to kill Nancy Lanza? Ponder why the official report (by Atty. Stephen Sedensky) admits that there were none to be found (highly unusual in a murder-suicide); yet DNA from an alleged felon from another state was found on a shell casing
  • Sedensky opposed the release of the 911 calls – Why?
  • Ask yourself why the names, ages and sex of the alleged victims are left out of the final report by Connecticut officials
  • Ask yourself why the clerk of Newtown entered into a secret agreement with the state legislature to avoid releasing death certificates to the press
  • Ask yourself, please, why those involved in the demolition of the school were required to sign lifetime gag orders about anything they saw or did not see
  • And pause a minute to reflect on why Obama administration officials told a school safety expert in California that the SH event was a FEMA drill and nobody died

The compilation of these and many more basic facts is available free of charge and, as a bonus, you can learn about the similarly fraudulent underpinnings of the Boston Marathon massacre.

May God save us all from the ignorance that keeps us enslaved on this wicked planet. And, lacking our own faculties or suffering from their erosion, may we be humble enough to follow the clear-sighted deductive reasoning of those with disciplined, astute minds and respect for the truth, no matter what conclusions, consequences and brain-shock we must suffer.

Fraud vitiates all records, all accounts, all claims of “just following orders.”

“The greatest charity one can do to another is to lead him to the truth.” ~Thomas Aquinas

~C.

SH: A censored statistical analysis by Carl Herman.

Wednesday morning, I received the following link from Jim Fetzer. The link was to an excellent article by Carl Herman on Washington’s Blog:

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2017/08/sandy-hook-shooting-mothers-average-age-giving-birth-36-years-old-odds-20-elderly-mothers-one-group-109418989131512370000-1-109-quintillion-418-quadrillion-989-tri.html

It was taken down shortly afterwards.  (Click on it and see for yourself.)

(Re: the author: Mr. Herman is a National Board Certified Teacher of US Government, Economics, and History; also credentialed in Mathematics. He worked with both US political parties over 18 years.)

Pernicious censorship has been deployed in the Sandy Hook event all along; it continues. Fortunately, a smart person copied the text. It is reproduced below, with the author’s permission.

[Censored text by Carl Herman begins here]

Sandy Hook shooting mothers’ average age giving birth = 36 years old. Odds of 20 such elderly mothers in one group = 109,418,989,131,512,370,000 to 1 (109 quintillion, 418 quadrillion, 989 trillion, 131 billion, 512 million, 370 thousand to 1) adds to overwhelming evidence of official fraud.

The alleged Sandy Hook shooting of December 2012 included 20 1st grade children with stated ages of 6 and 7 years old (only four at age seven). From public information,* the average age of those mothers in 2012 is 42.25; meaning their average age giving birth is 36. Some 1st grade students’ mothers will be 36 or older, but what are the odds of a random group of 20 such mothers averaging 36 years of age?

What are the odds?

According to the CDC, the percentage of US mothers giving their first birth at age 35 or older for 2006 is ~8%; about 1 in every 12. Pew Research Center reports that American mothers’ age 35 or older for any birth is 14%. Therefore, let’s estimate the percentage of 1st grade students’ mothers ages being 36 or older at 11%: about 1 in every 9. Age 36 is nine years above CDC average of age 27 for mothers with any number of children giving birth in 2006.

This means in an average US classroom of 27 1st grade students, 24 moms would be younger than 36, and only 3 would be 36 or older. To calculate the odds that the average age of Sandy Hook mothers at birth was 36, we multiply 1/9 to itself 20 times. This is the same method for the odds of flipping a coin: multiply 1/2 times the number of flips to have the odds of all heads or all tails (the odds of two straight heads is 1/4, 20 straight heads or tails is 1 in 1,048, 576 by placing 2 in the number to calculate, then looking at power of 20).

The odds that Sandy Hook mothers averaged an age of 36 is therefore about 109,418,989,131,512,370,000 to 1 (verify yourself by placing 9 in the calculator, then looking at the power of 20).

I had to look up how to say this number: 109 quintillion, 418 quadrillion, 989 trillion, 131 billion, 512 million, 370 thousand. Or:

one hundred nine quintillion,

four hundred eighteen quadrillion,

nine hundred eighty-nine trillion,

one hundred thirty-one billion,

five hundred twelve million,

three hundred seventy thousand.

How often would odds of 109,418,989,131,512,370,000 to 1 actually happen? 

On its face, it is statistically impossible for the Sandy Hook story to be true given this data point. This is more than enough by itself to question the accuracy of what you’re told about Sandy Hook. For comparisons:

  • The odds of a person being left-handed is 15% (~1/6 to 1/7). It’s more probable for a random group of 20 people to all be left-handed than for a random group of 1st grade students’ moms to be age 42.
  • The odds of a person having green eyes is 12%. That all 20 Sandy Hook moms have green eyes is more likely than their alleged ages.
  • The odds of winning the Powerball jackpot is ~175,000,000 to 1 (about 2 Americans a year). The odds of winning two consecutive Powerball jackpots is 30,625,000,000,000,000 to 1 (175 million times itself). It’s more likely that you would win two straight Powerball jackpots than the Sandy Hook moms’ ages being true.
  • The number of days since the claimed life of Jesus is ~730,000 (2,000 times 365). If Jesus were alive for 33 years, that’s 12,045 days. This means Jesus was alive 1.6% of the days passed since his birth (about 1/60). If you had a time machine to pick a random day to visit in those 730,000 days, it’s as likely you’d have 12 consecutive days in Jesus’ lifetime than it’s likely the Sandy Hook mothers’ ages is true.
  • The Earth is about 4.5 billion years old, which is 1.64 trillion days. If we had a computer randomly select one of those days, the odds of you picking that same day is 1.64 trillion to 1. You are more likely to accomplish this miracle than it’s probable the Sandy Hook moms’ ages are accurate.
  • In fact, the number of seconds Earth has existed is 141.7 quadrillion. You’re more likely to correctly predict which random second of Earth’s existence a computer selects than the Sandy Hook moms’ ages not being a lie.
  • Of course, we can also say you’re personally more likely to select a random 1/700th of a second from all Earth’s existence over 4.5 billion years than the Sandy Hook “mom” birth age of 36 not being a hoax.

What are the odds a Sandy Hook ‘dad’ would laugh it up and dramatize ‘getting into character’ before a press statement of grief?

46 seconds of alleged father, Robbie Parker, the day after the event:

The entire press conference, including Robbie apparently “getting into character” after his jovial entrance:

I don’t know how to calculate the odds that a father whose daughter was brutally murdered would approach a press conference smiling, laughing, saying, “I feel terrible to support this,” and then making a point to “get into character” (or whatever you’d call what happened).

I do know the odds of the mothers’ ages makes Robbie’s status as one of the dads statistically impossible, and therefore is hard evidence of what Robbie says of feeling terrible to support a lie.

This evidence is revealing, and without expert analysis into duping delight, is a matter of the observer’s judgment. Here is a counter-argument:

Robbie Parker displayed unimaginable grace, humility, compassion and kindness even as he faced the murder of his oldest daughter, a first-grade student who had yet to reach the age of seven. If you’re looking to exercise your critical thinking skills and amateur detective work, this particular angle is not an ethical one to explore, and anyone who has furthered such damaging claims should be heartily, deeply ashamed for compounded the pain of a family who have already experienced the worst possible loss imaginable.

But this statement becomes a lie of omission when other facts pointing to a “Sandy Hook Hoax” are considered.

What other facts argue that Sandy Hook was a staged event?

Thirteen various experts that include six current or retired college professors wrote Nobody died at Sandy Hook (2015). Among their documented findings that what occurred wasn’t a school massacre but a staged FEMA drill then portrayed as real for a political agenda:

Proof it was a drill was right before our eyes:

* the sign, “Everyone must check in!”

* boxes of bottled water & pizza cartons,

* Port-a-Potties present from scratch,

* many wearing name tags on lanyards,

* parents bringing children to the scene.

Proof it wasn’t a massacre:

* no surge of EMTs into the building,

* no Med-Evac helicopter was called,

* no string of ambulances to the school,

* no evacuation of 469 other students,

* no bodies placed on the triage tarps.

We have proof of photo fakery, proof of furnishing the Lanza home to serve as a prop, proof of refurbishing the school to serve as the stage. We even have the FEMA manual for the Sandy Hook event.

“All political power comes from the barrel of a gun. The communist party must command all the guns; that way, no guns can ever be used to command the party.” – Mao Tse Tung

Recent developments include:

Amazon and YouTube: Accessories after the fact to Fraud and Theft by Deception

Where were the Sandy Hook Children in the Newtown Schools?

Sandy Hook: Neil Heslin contradicts Official Narrative

Sandy Hook: Megyn Kelly and Alex Jones perpetrate a fraud on the American public

Sandy Hook Charade: “Noah Pozner” WAS Michael Vabner as a Child

An example from the above five:

One of the key claims for those who believe Sandy Hook “massacre” to be a false flag is that the school was closed in 2008, as Dr. Eowyn and others contend in Nobody Died at Sandy Hook (2015). This claim is mainly based on evidence of no Internet activity since 2008, obvious disrepair of the school, serious environmental problems such as asbestos contamination, no updating of parking signs to reflect then-current disability laws, eyewitness testimony that pointed to the school’s closure, and  the inability/unwillingness of Newtown School officials to provide documents of maintenance activity at the school after 2008. 

For abundant proof of the deplorable condition of Sandy Hook Elementary School, go to “SANDY HOOK: Wolfgang Halbig goes for the jugular in FOIA hearings” (8 May 2015), which includes the following interview in which school safety expert Wolfgang Halbig reviews the deplorable condition of the school building:

But why the hoax?!? But why the hoax?

But why the hoax?

After you’ve spent a few minutes with the above video of perhaps the #1 national school safety expert walking you through the data, the obvious question is why perpetuate this apparent hoax. The only way to ethically claim “official” stories are true requires you to review the strongest arguments that it was a hoax. So before you argue, have you looked at the factual claims?

Assuming you have, let’s address why. The conclusion of the authors of Nobody died at Sandy Hook is gun control, as supported in their quote from Mao that dictatorial government requires unarmed subjects.

I add this: We the People are on the edge of dispelling Emperor’s New Clothes delusion to recognize US .01% naked empire. The .01% are scrambling for ongoing control of propaganda to hide rogue state empire, and proactively working to seize guns for their own protection.

May I remind you of fundamental US history: the American Revolution started when our own government enacted involuntary gun control. Our .01% wanna-be masters would certainly prefer our voluntary gun control, and would engage in ongoing deception to achieve that policy objective.

Among the facts demonstrating a .01% US rogue state:

Don’t believe such ‘Big Lies’ are possible in the Land of the Free and Home of the Brave? How about assassinating President Kennedy, then outrageously lying for over 50 years?

With full documentation here:

AlphaMindControl’s revealing 3-minute video of CIA Director Colby’s testimony to the US Senate for the 1975 Church Committee admitting the CIA directs corporate media how to lie to the American public with “fake news” (six similar videos here):

3-minute video of Dan Rather’s fake news from November 25, 1963 to sell the lie that President Kennedy’s fatal head shot caused “violent forward motion” opposite to the fact his head was violently hit to cause backward motion (hat tip What Really Happened):

Breaking history for a future brighter than we can imagine: .01% arrests for OBVIOUS crimes centered in lie-started illegal Wars of Aggression, looting, constant lying

Given the prima facie evidence, it’s unreasonable for Americans to “hope for change” from Donald Trump’s “leadership.” We the People must demand .01% arrests or continue to serve as minions and work animals to rogue state empire. Until .01% arrests prove real leadership to stop ongoing slaughter of millions of human beings, harm to billions, and looting of trillions, it is only reasonable for Americans to embrace the evidence only lightly summarized in this article to conclude ongoing illegal .01% empire under a new “teleprompter reader-in-chief,” lying psychopathic puppet, oligarchic tool on the Right hand of one vicious imperial political body.

The categories of crime include:

  1. Wars of Aggression (the worst crime a nation can commit).
  2. Likely treason for lying to US military, ordering unlawful attack and invasions of foreign lands, and causing thousands of US military deaths.
  3. Crimes Against Humanity for ongoing intentional policy of poverty that’s killed over 400 million human beings just since 1995 (~75% children; more deaths than from all wars in Earth’s recorded history).

US military, law enforcement, and all with Oaths to support and defend the US Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, face an endgame choice:

In just 90 seconds, former US Marine Ken O’Keefe powerfully states how you may choose to voice “very obvious solutions”: arrest the criminal leaders (video starts at 20:51, then finishes this episode of Cross Talk):

3-minute videoPolice, Military – Was your Oath sincere?

* Consider this list of 16 mothers, and these additional 4 from Professor James Fetzer: Rebecca Ann Kowalski born 1968; maiden name Frazier = 44,  Michelle Gay (1972); maiden name Hartman = 40, Tricia Pinto 1970; maiden name Volkmann = 42, Cheyenne Wyatt 1975; maiden name Wirtz = 37. The mothers certainly look these ages.

**

Note: I make all factual assertions as a National Board Certified Teacher of US Government, Economics, and History, with all economics factual claims receiving zero refutation since I began writing in 2008 among Advanced Placement Macroeconomics teachers on our discussion board, public audiences of these articles, and international conferences. I invite readers to empower their civic voices with the strongest comprehensive facts most important to building a brighter future. I challenge professionals, academics, and citizens to add their voices for the benefit of all Earth’s inhabitants.

**

Carl Herman is a National Board Certified Teacher of US Government, Economics, and History; also credentialed in Mathematics. He worked with both US political parties over 18 years and two UN Summits with the citizen’s lobby, RESULTS, for US domestic and foreign policy to end poverty. He can be reached at Carl_Herman@post.harvard.edu

Note: Examiner.com has blocked public access to my articles on their site (and from other whistleblowers), so some links in my previous work are blocked. If you’d like to search for those articles other sites may have republished, use words from the article title within the blocked link. Or, go to http://archive.org/web/, paste the expired link into the box, click “Browse history,” then click onto the screenshots of that page for each time it was screen-shot and uploaded to webarchive. I’ll update as “hobby time” allows; including my earliest work from 2009 to 2011 (blocked author pages: herehere).

[Censored text by Carl Herman ends here]

View the accompanying videos at http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/.

~C.

 

 

 

 

A comedy of computer errors.

The Daily Caller has put out an excellent summary of the woes now being visited upon the elusive Awan brothers – the Pakistani Muslims hired as IT specialists by Debbie Wasserman Schultz and a host of other Democrats.

Before the Awans fled the country after a criminal probe of their treacherous activities began this February, they went on a hard-drive smashing spree. Due to the haste of the brothers’ departure, many of the drives were left behind.

This week, the FBI visited the Awans’ former domicile to collect the cyber-remains. Police were cued by a U.S. Marine, who recently rented the Awans’ former home and found computer debris in the garage.

The story is fascinating and would be funny if it didn’t represent serious breaches in U.S. national security and a potentially catastrophic political agenda that has yet to be fully unveiled. Read it for yourself here. To my knowledge, it isn’t being reported on by mainstream sources, who are too busy touting a groundless investigation of Russian hacking.

As the Trump administration banishes the “insider D.C. club” that has been undermining the will of the electorate as well as the president, this story may get buried in the rubble. But the broken hard drives won’t be; they are already on their way to the forensic lab.

Oops! It looks like Imran Awan didn’t manage to escape the country after all. He was intercepted at the Dulles Airport on July 25th, arrested and charged with bank fraud. Zero Hedge has added much to flesh out the story here. An excerpt:

“One bombshell that has been all but ignored by the main stream media is that Imran Awan had access to Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s iPad password, meaning that the brothers also had direct access to the notorious DNC emails.”

Update: The Gateway Pundit reports that the Awans were running intel to The Muslim Brotherhood:

“Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer revealed to Laura Ingraham, who filled in for Tucker Carlson Thursday evening, the Pakistani IT staffers were sending sensitive information to the Muslim Brotherhood.”